Isabell Stamm and Lina Eklund at LSE Impact Blog: “Social scientists are expanding the landscape of academic knowledge production by adopting online crowdsourcing techniques used by businesses to design, innovate, and produce. Researchers employ crowdsourcing for a number of tasks, such as taking pictures, writing text, recording stories, or digesting web-based data (tweets, posts, links, etc.). In an increasingly competitive academic climate, crowdsourcing offers researchers a cutting-edge tool for engaging with the public. Yet this socio-technical practice emerged as a business procedure rather than a research method and thus contains many hidden assumptions about the world which concretely affect the knowledge produced. With this comes a problematic reduction of research participants into a single, faceless crowd. This requires a critical assessment of crowdsourcing’s methodological assumptions….(More)”
With great power comes great responsibility: crowdsourcing raises methodological and ethical questions for academia
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in you inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
crowdsourcing
AI-enhanced crowdsourcing for disaster management: strengthening community resilience through social media
Posted in October 12, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen science, crowdsourcing
Bali Under Water: Communities Map Floods in Real Time to Guide Evacuations
Posted in September 18, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst
crowdsourcing, PEOPLE
Mapping the Unmapped
Posted in July 7, 2025 by Stefaan Verhulst