Isabell Stamm and Lina Eklund at LSE Impact Blog: “Social scientists are expanding the landscape of academic knowledge production by adopting online crowdsourcing techniques used by businesses to design, innovate, and produce. Researchers employ crowdsourcing for a number of tasks, such as taking pictures, writing text, recording stories, or digesting web-based data (tweets, posts, links, etc.). In an increasingly competitive academic climate, crowdsourcing offers researchers a cutting-edge tool for engaging with the public. Yet this socio-technical practice emerged as a business procedure rather than a research method and thus contains many hidden assumptions about the world which concretely affect the knowledge produced. With this comes a problematic reduction of research participants into a single, faceless crowd. This requires a critical assessment of crowdsourcing’s methodological assumptions….(More)”
With great power comes great responsibility: crowdsourcing raises methodological and ethical questions for academia
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Framework for the Governance of Indigenous Data: HASS and Indigenous Research Data Commons
Posted in June 5, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Open Innovation
Why the Gates Foundation Abandoned Article Processing Charges (and What They’re Doing Instead)
Posted in June 5, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
From COVID-19 to Hantavirus and Ebola: Why Access to Non-Traditional Data Remains a Critical Gap in Outbreak Preparedness
Posted in June 4, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst