Paper by Based on privacy calculus theory, we derive hypotheses on the role of perceived usefulness and privacy risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in public services. In a representative vignette experiment (n = 1,048), we asked citizens whether they would download a mobile app to interact in an AI-driven public service. Despite general concerns about privacy, we find that citizens are not susceptible to the amount of personal information they must share, nor to a more anthropomorphic interface. Our results confirm the privacy paradox, which we frame in the literature on the government’s role to safeguard ethical principles, including citizens’ privacy…(More)”.
AI-driven public services and the privacy paradox: do citizens really care about their privacy?
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Commission turns to artificial intelligence to write better laws
Posted in November 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
If AI Thinks for Us, Democracy Will Suffer
Posted in November 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Improving Group Deliberation through AI-Guided Self-Reflection
Posted in November 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst