Paper by Joshua S. Gans: “New generative artificial intelligence (AI) models, including large language models and image generators, have created new challenges for copyright policy as such models may be trained on data that includes copy-protected content. This paper examines this issue from an economics perspective and analyses how different copyright regimes for generative AI will impact the quality of content generated as well as the quality of AI training. A key factor is whether generative AI models are small (with content providers capable of negotiations with AI providers) or large (where negotiations are prohibitive). For small AI models, it is found that giving original content providers copyright protection leads to superior social welfare outcomes compared to having no copyright protection. For large AI models, this comparison is ambiguous and depends on the level of potential harm to original content providers and the importance of content for AI training quality. However, it is demonstrated that an ex-post `fair use’ type mechanism can lead to higher expected social welfare than traditional copyright regimes…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collective Intelligence
PEOPLE
In Referees We Trust? How Peer Review Became a Mark of Scientific Legitimacy
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Professionalizing deliberation: a Social Network Analysis of UK climate mini-publics
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Europe’s Tide of Citizen Assemblies: Unsung Success or Anticlimax?
Posted in October 14, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst