Discussion Paper (University of Heidelberg) by Lohse, Johannes and Goeschl, Timo and Diederich , Johannes: “Recent experimental research has examined whether contributions to public goods can be traced back to intuitive or deliberative decision-making, using response times in public good games in order to identify the specific decision process at work. In light of conflicting results, this paper reports on an analysis of response time data from an online experiment in which over 3400 subjects from the general population decided whether to contribute to a real world public good. The between-subjects evidence confirms a strong positive link between contributing and deliberation and between free-riding and intuition. The average response time of contributors is 40 percent higher than that of free-riders. A within-subject analysis reveals that for a given individual, contributing significantly increases and free-riding significantly decreases the amount of deliberation required.”
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Stefaan Verhulst
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Realising the potential of non-traditional data to improve health and wellbeing
Posted in May 20, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
A different way for cities to build data capacity
Posted in May 20, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Artificial Intelligence
DATA
Media, Democracy, and Generative AI: A Critical Juncture
Posted in May 20, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst