Paper by Till Feier, Jan Gogoll & Matthias Uhl: “The transfer of tasks with sometimes far-reaching implications to autonomous systems raises a number of ethical questions. In addition to fundamental questions about the moral agency of these systems, behavioral issues arise. We investigate the empirically accessible question of whether the imposition of harm by an agent is systematically judged differently when the agent is artificial and not human. The results of a laboratory experiment suggest that decision-makers can actually avoid punishment more easily by delegating to machines than by delegating to other people. Our results imply that the availability of artificial agents could provide stronger incentives for decision-makers to delegate sensitive decisions…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Collective Intelligence
Crowdsourcing
PEOPLE
A Crowdsourced Topic Map and Future Research Agenda for Women’s Health
Posted in May 18, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
People-centered evaluation: Theory and Action
Posted in May 17, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Blind spots
Posted in May 17, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst