Paper by Katherine Levine Einstein: “Recent research has demonstrated that participants in public meetings are unrepresentative of their broader communities. Some suggest that reducing barriers to meeting attendance can improve participation, while others believe doing so will produce minimal changes. The COVID-19 pandemic shifted public meetings online, potentially reducing the time costs associated with participating. We match participants at online public meetings with administrative data to learn whether: (1) online participants are representative of their broader communities and (2) representativeness improves relative to in-person meetings. We find that participants in online forums are quite similar to those in in-person ones. They are similarly unrepresentative of residents in their broader communities and similarly overwhelmingly opposed to the construction of new housing. These results suggest important limitations to public meeting reform. Future research should continue to unpack whether reforms might prove more effective at redressing inequalities in an improved economic and public health context…(More)”.
Still Muted: The Limited Participatory Democracy of Zoom Public Meetings
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
Citizen Engagement
PEOPLE
Democracy in Practice: A Report on Innovations in Participatory Governance
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
Democracy
INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION
Rebuilding Democracy: Why Large-Scale Reform Requires a New Institutional Model
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
DATA
Data Collaboratives
Open Data
Who counts in Trump’s America?
Posted in August 25, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst