Paper by Jbid Arsenyan and Julia Roloff: “As artificial intelligence (AI) applications are used for a wide range of tasks, the question about who is responsible for detecting and remediating problems caused by AI applications remains disputed. We argue that responsibility attributions proposed by management scholars fail to enable a practical solution as two aspects are overlooked: the difficulty to design a complex algorithm that does not produce adverse outcomes, and the conflict of interest inherited in some AI applications by design as proprietors and users employ the application for different purposes. In this conceptual paper, we argue that effective accountability can only be delivered through solutions that enable stakeholders to employ their collective intelligence effectively in compiling problem reports and analyze problem patterns. This allows stakeholders, including governments, to hold providers of AI applications accountable, and ensure that appropriate corrections are carried out in a timely manner…(More)”.
How to contribute:
Did you come across – or create – a compelling project/report/book/app at the leading edge of innovation in governance?
Share it with us at info@thelivinglib.org so that we can add it to the Collection!
About the Curator
Get the latest news right in your inbox
Subscribe to curated findings and actionable knowledge from The Living Library, delivered to your inbox every Friday
Related articles
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Democratic innovations in the UK: Reflections on historical trajectories across space and time
Posted in February 8, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
PEOPLE
New Site Lets AI Rent Human Bodies
Posted in February 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst
citizen engagement, PEOPLE
Designing Deliberative Lobbying: Three Institutional Solutions for an Open Lobby Democracy
Posted in February 7, 2026 by Stefaan Verhulst